•   Submit to to del.icio.us   Submit to to digg   submit to to reddit   submit to to StumbleUpon   submit to to Google   Submit to to Yahoo!



http://www.news.com/8301-10789_3-9898417-57.html



By Robert Vamos

Defense in Depth

March 19, 2008



Details remain sketchy regarding Monday's announcement of 4.2 million

credit card and debit cards exposed at a Maine-based supermarket chain.

However, public comments made by Ronald Hodge, CEO of Hannaford

Supermarkets, suggest that even with recent improvements in payment card

transaction security, there may be holes.



The standards organization, PCI Security Standards International, was

founded by American Express, Discover Financial Services, JCB,

MasterCard Worldwide, and Visa International. In October 2007, they

implemented the PCI Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), which includes,

among other things, network specifications. Dr. Neal Krawetz of Hacker

Factor Solutions said that PCI DSS allows for the storage of card

numbers and expiration dates on a branch server. And that's what may be

been compromised in this case.



Krawetz said, generally, that the traffic between the cash register and

the credit card companies is secure. The transaction often takes place

at the cash register with the customer standing by. After the customer

leaves the information is broadcast to a branch server.



If criminals were to target a single cash register, they would not

achieve the volume credited to this latest data breach; to steal 4.2

million accounts would require to a larger repository. In retail stores,

especially in large chains, branch servers are used to collect data from

individual cash registers and may store the data locally, regionally, or

nationally.



That's why branch servers are becoming the targets of sophisticated

attacks. Last summer, Krawetz released a paper (click for PDF) outlining

that the communication between the cash register and the branch server

is not secure. Sometimes the data from cash register to branch server is

transmitted wirelessly over unencrypted networks, although there is not

enough information here to suggest that is what happened at Hannaford.



Krawetz cautioned that at this point many important details regarding

Hannaford are lacking. "The size of the compromise sure sounds like it

could be a branch or regional server." Hodge, in his public letter to

Hannaford customers, acknowledged that the intrusion affected the

Hannaford stores, Sweetbay stores in Florida, and certain independently

owned retail locations in the Northeast that carry Hannaford products.



If branch servers are to blame, recent security standards would appear

to be lacking. The Washington Post's Brian Krebs quoted a CyberTrust

executive, Bryan Satrin, who echoed that concern, saying that "these

organizations can be (compliant with the credit card industry security

standards) and still have customer data stolen."



Last March, TJX announced that 45.7 million accounts were compromised

over a two-year period in a data breach of customer records at T.J. Maxx

and Marshalls retail chains.





___________________________________________________

Subscribe to InfoSec News

http://www.infosecnews.org/mailman/listinfo/isn





addto Add this link to... report Bury 


Comments Who Voted Related Links