•   Submit to to del.icio.us   Submit to to digg   submit to to reddit   submit to to StumbleUpon   submit to to Google   Submit to to Yahoo!







From: InfoSec News <alerts_at_private>




Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:02:58 -0600 (CST)






http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article5102160.ece



By Michael Evans

Defence Editor

The Times

November 7, 2008



The unmasking of an Iranian spy who was working as a British general.s

personal interpreter has become an embarrassing espionage fiasco raising

questions about the screening for sensitive military posts.



Corporal Daniel James, 45, who had been security-vetted to work

alongside General Sir David Richards when he was commander of Nato's

International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) in Afghanistan in 2006,

was yesterday remanded in custody after being convicted of spying for

Iran.



The jury was discharged after failing to reach a verdict on two other

charges.



Security sources said the actions of James, who was born in Tehran, had

been a serious embarrassment for the British Army and undermined

relations with allies, who might feel constrained from sharing future

intelligence.



James had seemed to be a loyal member of the Territorial Army, and

defence sources confirmed that he had been vetted before he joined the

TA in 1987 and when he was selected to act as interpreter to General

Richards, who is to succeed as Chief of the General Staff in August next

year.



Thorough checks on his background, however, should have uncovered

certain features of his lifestyle which might have raised the alarm. He

had strong ties to Tehran where his family still lived after the Islamic

revolution, he had kept his Iranian passport even after becoming a

British citizen in 1986, he was 25,000 in debt, and he practised black

magic.



Ministry of Defence sources said there had been nothing in the security

checks to indicate that James was anything other than slightly odd. "He

was regarded as an oddball but harmless and he had all the right

clearances," one MoD source said.



MI5 counter-espionage officers were called in to investigate James after

it was discovered he had been sending e-mails and making telephone calls

to Colonel Mohammad Hossein Heydari, a military assistant at the Iranian

Embassy in Kabul, the Afghan capital. Although his espionage ambitions

were preempted before he could become a fully fledged secret agent for

Iran, his contacts with Colonel Heydari - and the sensitive documents he

was found to have stored on a USB computer memory stick - caused a

full-scale alert.



Security sources said it was not just the content of the e-mails and

telephone calls that raised the alarm, but the wider implications of a

British soldier in a confidential position being prepared to divulge

information without authority.



The prosecution said James had two "Nato-confidential" military

situation reports about troop movements and fuel stocks in Afghanistan

stored on a USB device. The jury was told that he had no right to

possess the reports. In one e-mail to Colonel Heydari, he wrote: "I have

a very good present for you."



The security sources said that the unauthorised communication with a

potential enemy and suspected passing of confidential information to a

third party broke the rules governing the handling of sensitive

documents.



The realisation that James was a fantasist who believed he could

personally bring peace to Afghanistan by indulging in his own form of

diplomacy - handing out business cards to Afghan ministers and to the

Iranian Ambassador in Kabul - was also a deep embarrassment to the Army.

James had changed his name by deed poll in 1997 because he wanted to

sound British, but he joined the TA under his birth name, Esmail

Mohammed Beigi Gamasai. He was called up for duty in Afghanistan because

he was fluent in Dari and Farsi, a rare talent in which the Army was

desperately lacking.



The MoD said James, who was convicted under the Official Secrets Act of

communicating with an enemy, had been discharged from the TA.



The prosecution will seek advice from Baroness Scotland, QC, the

Attorney-General, about a possible retrial.





______________________________________________

Visit the InfoSec News Security Bookstore

Best Selling Security Books and More!

http://www.shopinfosecnews.org



Received on Fri Nov 07 2008 - 01:02:58 PST





addto Add this link to... report Bury 


Comments Who Voted Related Links