•   Submit to to del.icio.us   Submit to to digg   submit to to reddit   submit to to StumbleUpon   submit to to Google   Submit to to Yahoo!



http://www.gcn.com/online/vol1_no1/45811-1.html



By William Jackson

GCN.com

02/13/08



An information technology industry group formed to develop and share

best practices for secure software development has released its first

paper, outlining the core practices being used by member companies.



The Software Association Forum for Excellence in Code (SAFECode) was

announced in October as a way to enhance communications between software

companies. Many companies have internal programs to improve the quality

of the code they are producing, but a lack of communications has limited

their effectiveness, said former White House cybersecurity adviser Paul

Kurtz, executive director of SAFECode.



The paper [1], titled Software Assurance: An Overview of Current

Industry Best Practices, is the groups first product.



As the initial step in our efforts, SAFECode has identified the

assurance best practices that have proven to be effective across its

member companies, Kurtz said.



Founding members of SAFECode are EMC, Juniper Networks, Microsoft, SAP

and Symantec.



The group acknowledged the difficulty of prescribing security processes

across the technology industry. Not surprisingly, there is no single

method for driving security and integrity into and across the globally

distributed processes that yield technology products and services, the

report said. Yet, regardless of the method used, there is a core set of

best practices for software assurance and security that apply to diverse

development environments.



?By sharing this information, we hope to encourage the adoption of these

types of practices by other software developers and respond to the

growing customer desire for greater visibility into the steps technology

vendors are taking to continually improve the security of their

products, Kurtz said.



The paper identifies and explains security best practices and controls

currently used by SAFECode members:



* Security training: A prerequisite to coding secure software is for

engineers to be knowledgeable about information security issues

affecting users.



* Defining security requirements: Requirements must be defined in

the early stages of product development.



* Secure design: The early design phase must identify and address

potential threats to the application and ways to reduce those

risks.



* Secure coding: The product development team must implement secure

programming practices.



* Secure source code handling: The integrity and confidentiality of

source code must be protected.



* Security testing: Specialized validation should be implemented to

ensure that security requirements, secure design and coding

guidelines are followed.



* Security documentation: Documentation for users should help

customers understand how to optimally configure security controls,

and how configuration options could produce potential security

vulnerabilities.



* Security readiness: Prior to releasing a product, the application

developer must evaluate, document and assess risks posed by

potential security gaps in the product.



* Security response: An incident response mechanism must be in place

to relay reports of security vulnerabilities (exploited or not)

after the product is released to the product development or

sustaining teams for mitigation.



* Integrity verification: Products must offer customers methods to

verify that the software they have acquired is from their trusted

vendor.



* Security research: Ongoing research should be conducted into new

threat vectors and ways to mitigate them.



* Security evangelism: Leaders in the area of software assurance

should promote the use of best practices by discussing their

practices and findings in open forums, articles, papers and books.



Vendors who have implemented these best practices have seen dramatic

improvements in software product assurance and security, Kurtz said.



Beyond development by the vendor, the paper also outlines the

responsibilities of integrators, who must work with vendors to mitigate

vulnerabilities that could be introduced when an application is

integrated into a heterogeneous environment; operators, who must ensure

that systems remain properly configured and patched and protect them

from intrusion; and end users, who should report bugs and not introduce

untrusted software into systems.



[1] http://www.safecode.org/publications/SAFECode_BestPractices0208.pdf





___________________________________________________

Subscribe to InfoSec News

http://www.infosecnews.org/mailman/listinfo/isn





addto Add this link to... report Bury 


Comments Who Voted Related Links