•   Submit to to del.icio.us   Submit to to digg   submit to to reddit   submit to to StumbleUpon   submit to to Google   Submit to to Yahoo!



http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2008/04/securitymatters_0417



By Bruce Schneier

Security Matters

Wired.com

04.17.08



Last week was the RSA Conference, easily the largest information

security conference in the world. More than 17,000 people descended on

San Francisco's Moscone Center to hear some of the more than 250 talks,

attend I-didn't-try-to-count parties, and try to evade over 350

exhibitors vying to sell them stuff.



Talk to the exhibitors, though, and the most common complaint is that

the attendees aren't buying.



It's not the quality of the wares. The show floor is filled with new

security products, new technologies, and new ideas. Many of these are

products that will make the attendees' companies more secure in all

sorts of different ways. The problem is that most of the people

attending the RSA Conference can't understand what the products do or

why they should buy them. So they don't.



I spoke with one person whose trip was paid for by a smallish security

firm. He was one of the company's first customers, and the company was

proud to parade him in front of the press. I asked him whether he walked

through the show floor, looking at the company's competitors to see if

there was any benefit to switching.



"I can't figure out what any of those companies do," he replied.



I believe him. The booths are filled with broad product claims,

meaningless security platitudes and unintelligible marketing literature.

You could walk into a booth, listen to a five-minute sales pitch by a

marketing type, and still not know what the company does. Even seasoned

security professionals are confused.



Commerce requires a meeting of the minds between buyer and seller, and

it's just not happening. The sellers can't explain what they're selling

to the buyers, and the buyers don't buy because they don't understand

what the sellers are selling. There's a mismatch between the two;

they're so far apart that they're barely speaking the same language.



This is a bad thing in the near term -- some good companies will go

bankrupt and some good security technologies won't get deployed -- but

it's a good thing in the long run. It demonstrates that the computer

industry is maturing: IT is getting complicated and subtle, and users

are starting to treat it like infrastructure.



For a while now I have predicted the death of the security industry. Not

the death of information security as a vital requirement, of course, but

the death of the end-user security industry that gathers at the RSA

Conference. When something becomes infrastructure -- power, water,

cleaning service, tax preparation -- customers care less about details

and more about results. Technological innovations become something the

infrastructure providers pay attention to, and they package it for their

customers.



No one wants to buy security. They want to buy something truly useful --

database management systems, Web 2.0 collaboration tools, a company-wide

network -- and they want it to be secure. They don't want to have to

become IT security experts. They don't want to have to go to the RSA

Conference. This is the future of IT security.



You can see it in the large IT outsourcing contracts that companies are

signing -- not security outsourcing contracts, but more general IT

contracts that include security. You can see it in the current wave of

industry consolidation: not large security companies buying small

security companies, but non-security companies buying security

companies. And you can see it in the new popularity of software as a

service: Customers want solutions; who cares about the details?



Imagine if the inventor of antilock brakes -- or any automobile safety

or security feature -- had to sell them directly to the consumer. It

would be an uphill battle convincing the average driver that he needed

to buy them; maybe that technology would have succeeded and maybe it

wouldn't. But that's not what happens. Antilock brakes, airbags and that

annoying sensor that beeps when you're backing up too close to another

object are sold to automobile companies, and those companies bundle them

together into cars that are sold to consumers. This doesn't mean that

automobile safety isn't important, and often these new features are

touted by the car manufacturers.



The RSA Conference won't die, of course. Security is too important for

that. There will still be new technologies, new products and new

startups. But it will become inward-facing, slowly turning into an

industry conference. It'll be security companies selling to the

companies who sell to corporate and home users -- and will no longer be

a 17,000-person user conference.



---



Bruce Schneier is CTO of BT Counterpane and author of Beyond Fear:

Thinking Sensibly About Security in an Uncertain World. You can read

more of his writings on his website.





-==-

Let identityLoveSock take your personal information into

their wanting hands. http://www.identity-love-sock.com/

Because victims have money too.





addto Add this link to... report Bury 


Comments Who Voted Related Links